Cases 21 - 30 of 98
STRINGER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STRINGER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILE v. MRAVITZ et al
as 3:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
THOMAS S. VILE
Defendant:
JOHN MRAVITZ , CAPTAIN SNYDER , CHCA HYDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVARADO v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2017cv03283
Petitioner:
OSCAR ALVARADO
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARPER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2017cv00929
Petitioner:
JASON JAMES HARPER
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATTHEWS v. WINGARD
as 2:2017cv00916
Petitioner:
JHERI MATTHEWS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FIELDS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2017cv03082
Petitioner:
MAURICE FIELDS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUMMERT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2017cv00108
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID HUMMERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , TREVOR WINGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VALENTI v. WINGARD et al
as 1:2017cv00753
Petitioner:
Isaiah S. Valenti
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard, The District Attorney of the County of York and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PECK v. WINGARD
as 3:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STEPHEN PECK
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
