Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01783
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Agedah v. Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Respondent:
Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security ("DHS/ICE")
Petitioner:
Theophilus Tari Agedah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Agedah v. Caroline Detention Facility ("CDF") et al
as 1:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Theophilus Tari Agedah
Defendant:
Caroline Detention Facility ("CDF") and Department of Homeland Security ("DHS/ICE")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez-Peralta v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Gutierrez-Peralta
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS ICE) and Superintendent of Caroline Detention Facility (CDF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
