Cases 21 - 30 of 224
Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00424
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner:
Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beswick et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02765
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Dirkis Castrillo-Castrillo, Olvin Geovany Rodriguez, Yoscal Mogena-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pena v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv02482
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and Director Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Pena Raynell Leonardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Bonilla v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv02483
Petitioner:
Durel Jordon Bonilla
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker and Acting Secretary Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Quito v. Decker
as 1:2019cv10662
Respondent:
Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Sergio Quito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Binet v. Decker
as 4:2019cv01815
Respondent:
Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Hector Lenny Caba Binet
Defendant:
William P. Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bob v. DHS et al
as 1:2019cv10422
Respondent:
ICE, DHS and Ins. Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Nata S. Bob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
THOMAS et al v. DECKER et al
as 2:2019cv19302
Respondent:
Medical Defendants (John Doe), H.O. THOMAS DECKER and Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM, NATA S. BOB and KENNETH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raheem v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv19300
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM
Respondent:
Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden, Medical Defendants (John Doe) and H.O. THOMAS DECKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosemond v. Decker et al
as 7:2019cv09657
Petitioner:
Jean Rosemond
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
