Cases 21 - 30 of 420
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. LORAH et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
MARQUICE EVANS
Defendant:
RICHARD LORAH, DETECTIVE SEAN BOGART, TOM ROBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STAATS v. GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY: JOHN WETZEL, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA: TOM WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE STAATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLIGAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv00744
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MAYOR BILL PEDUTO, PA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
MALIK LARON MILLIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CERVANTES v. PA BOARD OF PROBATION/PAROLE et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Respondent:
ZAKEN, PA BOARD OF PROBATION/PAROLE, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Petitioner:
JOSUE A. CERVANTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TREADWAY v. PA DOJ et al
as 2:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER TREADWAY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPROW, TOM WOLF, ALL LAWYERS OF GOVERNMENT OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tisdale et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2021cv00192
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and Rachel Levine
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tisdale, Anton McCullough and Emery Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Scott W. Walters, John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. Marsh et al
as 1:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Z.N. Hammers, Major Curtis Grice, Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
