Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-16207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN MONTOYA, UNKNOWN WASHMON and others
Dawson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dawson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Lang, E Vinluan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Montoya, Unknown Washmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-15219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN MENDOZA, UNKNOWN WASHMON and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-15045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ADOC, UNKNOWN ADU-TUTU, Director of Medical Services at ADOC and others
Van v. Mendoza et al
as 4:2011cv00008
Petitioner:
Walter J Van, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown Mendoza and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv02580
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Washmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riess v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Eastlund, Unknown Wiscombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
