Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Watkins v. Gogoiu et al
as 2:2016cv02779
Plaintiff:
Derek Claude Watkins
Defendant:
Unknown Gogoiu, Unknown Scantlebury, Mesa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins #053789 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02252
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Charles Gregory Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Winn
as 4:2012cv00882
Petitioner:
Michael O'Brian Watkins
Respondent:
L Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Korba v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2012cv00857
Petitioner:
Gregory J Korba
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demay v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
Gerald A Demay
Defendant:
Clarence W Dupnik, Unknown Mines, Unknown Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kennard Watkins
Defendant:
B Brown, L Lerma, A Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01967
Petitioner:
Derek C Watkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Arizona Attorney General, State of and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Goddard et al
as 2:2009cv01852
Petitioner:
John Kenneth Watkins, III
Defendant:
Terrence Goddard and Charles L. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Marlin Watkins
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Pathe Diop, Adam Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Ryan et al
as 4:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hammond
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Fineberg, Marioche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
