Cases 21 - 30 of 437
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rashid v. Kurtulus et al
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Kalican Kurtulus, Jerome F French, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mulligan et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Leslie Williams
Defendant:
William Mulligan, Rodriguez, Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gawlik v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Steven Strom, Jennifer Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubet v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jose Rubet
Defendant:
Jennifer Peterson, Blackstoc, Corr. Officer Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Ned Lamont, Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Brunelle et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
William Perez
Defendant:
Christopher Brunelle, Angel Quiros, Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hajati v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
George Hajati
Defendant:
United States Of America, Williams Barr, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
