Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Harris v. Atchley et al
as 3:2021cv06577
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jay Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Atchley, Kathleen Allison, T. Vang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner, Arthur v. Nehls, Teresa et al
as 3:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Arthur T. Conner
Defendant:
Teresa Nehls, United States, Warden John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blacknell, III v. Atchley
as 4:2021cv04508
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew Atchley
Petitioner:
Joseph Blacknell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYES v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv12151
Defendant:
JANE DOE NURSE 2, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MAYES
3Rd Party Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farias v. Atchley et al
as 5:2021cv04167
Defendant:
C. Lopez, D.C Ear, M. Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Farias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savla, Vishal v. Marske, Matthew
as 3:2021cv00422
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Marske
Petitioner:
Vishal Savla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lazor v. Atchley et al
as 3:2021cv04038
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Acting Warden Matthew Atchley
Petitioner:
Free Lazor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lara v. Atchley
as 4:2021cv02403
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District of California and Warden Matthew Atchley
Petitioner:
Juan Lara Pacheco and Juan Pacheco Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WELCH v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv04526
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JANE & jOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, COUNTY EMPLOYEES JANE & JOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, LIUETENANT R. CLUGSTEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff, James v. Marske, Matthew
as 3:2021cv00275
Petitioner:
James A Huff
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Marske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
