Cases 21 - 30 of 150
WATSON v. DELBASO et al
as 2:2019cv02958
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT THERESA DELBASO
Petitioner:
JEFFREY WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. HOWE et al
as 2:2019cv02772
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY PORTER
Defendant:
P/O RIVERA, P/O HOWE, P/O SANCHEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2019cv00335
Petitioner:
WILLIAM GREGORY, KRIS JOHNSON, RAYMAR PACK and others
Respondent:
MAIL ROOM CLERK, C.O. I KRAMER, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Green et al v. Fitzgerald et al
as 4:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Thomas Todd, James Spruill, Kris Johnson and others
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Inmate Employment Clerk, Rich Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04460
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, INNOCENT PROJECT and MARISSA B. BLUESTINE
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, OFFICE OF POPULATION MANAGEMENT, SCOTT A KNICKELSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WALKER, QUINTEZ TALLEY, GARLAND BAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Watson v. Marsh et al
as 3:2018cv01718
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Robert Marsh
Petitioner:
LaQuincey A. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURTON v. WATSON
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
DANTE BURTON
Defendant:
RHU SGT. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Watson v. Lane
as 3:2018cv00676
Petitioner:
Michael Watson
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
