Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Allison V Pitts v. Martin Hoshino et al
as 2:2012cv10402
Respondent:
Martin Hoshino and William W Wynder
Petitioner:
Allison V Pitts
Pitts v. Cates et al
as 2:2012cv01310
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Pitts
Defendant:
M. Cates, G. Swarthout , K. Starke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Davis et al
as 2:2012cv00823
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Pitts
Defendant:
C. Davis, R. Flieschman, The State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. The Department of Mental Health, et al.
as 3:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Castillo
Defendant:
The Department of Mental Health, North Kern State Prison, Brons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Mercy Hospital of Bakersfield
as 1:2011cv01140
Plaintiff:
Michael - Thomas
Defendant:
Mercy Hospital of Bakersfield, CDC California Department of Corrections, Sal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Mercy Hospital of Bakersfield
as 3:2011cv03044
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Mercy Hospital of Bakersfield, CDC California Department of Corrections, Sal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lee Pitts v. Terri Gonzalaz
as 5:2011cv00746
Respondent:
Terri Gonzalaz
Petitioner:
James Lee Pitts
Richard Duane Sawyer v. The People and State of California et al
as 2:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Richard Duane Sawyer
Defendant:
The People and State of California, Atascadero Hospital, Osran Hadley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Thomas Earl Pitts Jr v. Melven Hunter
as 2:2007cv05677
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Pitts, Jr
Defendant:
Melvin Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Thomas Earl Pitts Jr v. Lloyd Hatfield
as 2:2007cv02153
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Pitts, Jr
Defendant:
Lloyd Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
