Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Franklin v. Bolin
as 0:2023cv02379
Petitioner:
Mark Franklin, Jr.
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv01675
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Krasky v. Bolin
as 0:2023cv01631
Petitioner:
Edward Richard Krasky
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01528
Petitioner:
Ashley Williams
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Faul v. King
as 0:2023cv01337
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Mark W. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brenizer v. USA
as 0:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
Kyle William Brenizer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv00839
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Colette S. Peters and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
