Cases 21 - 30 of 50,333
HILL v. WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2024cv00834
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRANCH v. C/O. DILLARD et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
WERDELL BRANCH
Defendant:
C/O. DILLARD and C/O. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCLAURIN v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
DORRELL ANTWUN MCLAURIN
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT., JOHN DOE, DET. PILARSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burroughs v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Burroughs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MARSH v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. MARSH
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., KATHLEEN BURNS, MELLISA DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN v. RICARD
as 2:2024cv02485
Petitioner:
ANDRE VAN
Respondent:
WARDEN RICARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ZERUTH v. WARDEN OF SCI FOREST
as 1:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLISON v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SCOTT ALLISON
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SAMUEL DUNKLE, WARDEN BLAIR COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmoulin v. USP-Lewisburg
as 1:2024cv00930
Petitioner:
Lester Desmoulin
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
