Cases 31 - 40 of 30,665
CENTER FOR AT-RISK ELDERS, INC. v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR AT-RISK ELDERS, INC.
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF and THERESA WISCHMEYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
LANDIS J. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
JULIAN DEVELL GRADY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYKIN v. MARION COUNTY JAIL PRIMARY HEALTHCARE PROVIDER
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. BOYKIN
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL PRIMARY HEALTHCARE PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Leonidas Roy Fields
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vibbert v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Colton T Vibbert and Colton Vibbert
Defendant:
John Galipeau, White, Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PARR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
TOMMY W. PARR
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
