Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Williams v. Mulligan et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Leslie Williams
Defendant:
William Mulligan, Rodriguez, Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Brunelle et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
William Perez
Defendant:
Christopher Brunelle, Angel Quiros, Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grullon-Rodriguez v. Nash et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Walkiria Grullon-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Nash and Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Machinski et al
as 3:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Sharlim Marie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tricia A. Machinski and Ompakash Pillai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnel v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
Brown, Gooley, Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petion v. Chevalier et al
as 3:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Divenson Petion
Defendant:
Chevalier, Rollin Cook, Antonio Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Francis Santo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jennifer Reis, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Papusa et al
as 3:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Ralph Green
Defendant:
Papusa, Stanley, Concepcion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
