Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Nelson v. Hardeman County Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01331
Plaintiff:
Oswald M. Nelson
Defendant:
Trainmem and Mental Health Provider, FNU Henson, FNU Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hardeman County Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Oswald M. Nelson
Defendant:
Trainmem and Mental Health Provider, f/n/u Henson, f/nu Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Hunter
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Williams and (f/n/u) Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce et al v. Hawkins County, TN et al
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donald E Pierce, James W Grooms, Jr, Issac Taylor Dean and others
Defendant:
Hawkins County, TN, Hawkins County Sheriff Office and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Sealey et al
as 3:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
E Sealey and Parnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins et al v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Darren Collins and Tony Lamar Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Maury County Jail and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00121
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamont Pierce, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holland v. Easterling et al
as 1:2011cv01299
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Holland
Defendant:
Joseph G. Easterling and Amy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hasan v. Psychological Consulting Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul Hasan, Perry Allan and Scott Pierce
Defendant:
Psychological Consulting Services, Inc., Arthur W Stair, III and Nate Jolly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2011cv01283
Plaintiff:
Shaun Pierce
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tony Parker, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
