Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,610
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner: Rickey R Armour
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant: Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant: GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner: Quinton Jennings
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRASHEAR v. WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
as 1:2024cv00727
Petitioner: EDWARD BRASHEAR
Respondent: WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant: Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff: David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified: PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEHADEH v. USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00151
Petitioner: JAMAL SHEHADEH
Respondent: USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner: DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?