Cases 31 - 40 of 967
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 8:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Bracy
as 3:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Angelo Bobby Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Charmain Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. McConahay
as 1:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Jonathan Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Freeman Brooks
Defendant:
FNU Bennett, Sgt. FNU Reynolds, FNU Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Bennett et al
as 7:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Freeman Brooks
Defendant:
Warden FNU Bennett, Captain FNU Reynolds, Major FNU Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Correctional Officer Acosta et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas, Gabriel Salascio and Gabriel Paul Salas
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Acosta and Correctional Officer Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duane Woullard v. Branch, et al
as 23-14156
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A. ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
MILLER v. CENTURION et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ARTHERIO MILLER, SR
Defendant:
CENTURION, GILBERT NOE, PAUL A AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2023cv02232
Plaintiff:
Christopher Petteway
Defendant:
State of Florida, Judge Ronald A. Legendre, Attorney Mark R. Lippman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
