Cases 31 - 40 of 46
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00373
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, MATA and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00376
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, LUKENS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN et al v. US PENITENTIARY - CANAAN et al
as 2:2015cv00366
Defendant:
BURKETT, DOBUSHAK, EBBERT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00847
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. APKER
as 2:2013cv00346
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, GARY L. HENDERSON, RYAN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MANN et al v. BAILEY, et al.
as 2:2013cv00341
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, BAILEY, BILILA and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FISCHER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2013cv00035
Defendant:
RANDY CHAPMAN, ANDY LASHER, MILES MANN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLAN FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MANNS v. LECLERC, M.D. et al
as 1:2011cv01550
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JANE DOES, KIM GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
GARY E. MANNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner-Bey v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2009cv00281
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Turner-Bey
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Edwin Buss, Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
