Cases 31 - 40 of 3,211
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Jessica Sage and BoP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Romance v. Roys et al
as 7:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Ravon Romance
Defendant:
William Roys, David Buchanan, William Elberth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Williams et al
as 9:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Mercer
Defendant:
Donald Williams, Court Holly, ADA Conright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundscho v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv06032
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bundscho
Defendant:
Chief C. Green, William Whalen and Erie County Jain/Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Mercer
Defendant:
Donald Williams, Court Holly, ADA Conright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polhamus v. Brinkeroff
as 9:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
William Polhamus
Defendant:
Bethany Brinkeroff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Westchester County D.O.C. et al
as 1:2023cv10884
Plaintiff:
Robert Woods
Defendant:
Westchester County D.O.C., Williams #1052 and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10807
Plaintiff:
Norbert S. Williams, III
Defendant:
City of New York and NYC Dept. of Corrections Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hilton et al
as 1:2023cv08955
Petitioner:
Ronald Williams
Respondent:
Dep. Hilton, D. Vennetozzi and M. Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
