Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Powell v. Kinsley et al
as 2:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clinton R. Powell
Defendant:
Dana Y. Kinsley, Ronald Abernathy, Benjamin Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Muwakkil Seifullah Bey Shabazz
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roebuck v. Mathena et al
as 7:2011cv00305
Defendant:
Barker, Harold W. Clarke, Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Roebuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roebuck v. Mathena et al
as 1:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
Mario Roebuck
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Julius Wilson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Harvey et al
as 3:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
A. P. Harvey, Y. M. Taylor, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Ray et al
as 7:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Global Tel. Link, Gene M. Johnson, Keeffee Commissay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz et al v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00638
Plaintiff:
Muwakkil S. B. Shabazz, Khalid Muhammad, Geronimo Muhammad and others
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Linda Shear, Gene M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uren v. Director
as 1:2010cv00547
Petitioner:
Robert Y Uren
Respondent:
Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Bucles et al
as 7:2009cv00409
Plaintiff:
Antonio Walters
Defendant:
M. Bucles, Collins, R. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Robertson
as 3:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Randall R. Inman, Sr.
Defendant:
Stephanie Y. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
