Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Bush v. Thurber
as 4:2012cv03195
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerdan v. Bruns et al
as 4:2012cv03168
Defendant:
Allen, Fred Britten, Bruns and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Edward Jerdan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. USA
as 8:2012cv00188
Petitioner:
Willie B. Haynes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perry v. Flowers
as 4:2012cv03095
Defendant:
Karen B. Flowers
Plaintiff:
Larry James Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Randall et al
as 4:2012cv03074
Defendant:
Jon Bruning, Don Kleine, George R. Love and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Fletcher et al
as 4:2012cv03061
Defendant:
Joseph Fletcher and Ora Thomas Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Gracy Sedlak and Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03215
Defendant:
Randy Bartells, Cockrell, Michael Edison and others
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolman v. Lancaster County District Court et al
as 4:2011cv03043
Defendant:
Lancaster County Attroney Office, Lancaster County Corrections and Lancaster County District Court
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Woolman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolman v. Lancaster County Corrections
as 4:2011cv03044
Respondent:
Lancaster County Attroneys Office
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael B. Woolman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
