Cases 31 - 40 of 449
Puller v. Unknown, et al
as 7:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Colonel Unknown, Wells, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00565
Petitioner:
Daniel Atkins
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Haug et al
as 7:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tolbert
Defendant:
Superintendent Kimberly D. Haug, Major Daniel ODell and Major Keith Fleeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Schaeffer et al
as 7:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tolbert
Defendant:
Trooper Douglas D. Schaeffer and Trooper Daniel L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Charncey Laquinn Daniels
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puller v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Fluvanna Correctional Center, Unknown, Officer Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Carl A. Manis, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Conley
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Dr. B. Mullins, MD, Dr. H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Flemming et al
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Leslie Flemming, J. Morrison, M. Engalkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
