Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Alsaud #108844 v. Meyers et al
as 2:2018cv01490
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Defendant:
Unknown Meyers, Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01405
Petitioner:
James A Day
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons #321572 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lavelle Simmons
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Days, J Silves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koskella v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 4:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Keith Eric Koskella
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, Unknown Covington, Unknown Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrich v. ACLU Foundation of Arizona et al
as 4:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Devin Andrich
Defendant:
ACLU Foundation of Arizona, Prison Law Office, ACLU National Prison Project and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day #050715 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00774
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Moody, Unknown Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Dean et al
as 3:2016cv08298
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Sandra Dean, Mohave, County of, Matthew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day #295157 v. Thompson et al
as 2:2016cv04264
Petitioner:
James A Day
Respondent:
Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, Lucy Burciaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
