Cases 31 - 40 of 390
MOSES v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv03385
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ROY MOSES
Defendant:
JAMIE SORBER, DEPUTY SIPPLE, DR. BAZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BADDICK et al
as 2:2022cv02973
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Defendant:
PETER JOHN BRADDOCK, III, P. SAIKIA BORA, CHRISTINA HAUSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. PASERALLI et al
as 2:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY PASERALLI, SGT WAGNER, ASHLEY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mason et al
as 1:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Jackson
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Correctional Officer Harris, Correctional Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Wellspan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2022cv00338
Petitioner:
Gregory A. Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Knapp et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Rhonshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Unit Manager Knapp, Brubaker, Superintendent Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCI-PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
SOLOMON JOHNSON
Respondent:
E. SCI-Pine Grove, E. Ray, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. SCI-Pine Grove et al
as 3:2021cv02052
Plaintiff:
Solomon Johnson
Defendant:
SCI-Pine Grove, E. Ray, Superintendent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
