Cases 31 - 40 of 48
McMullin v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv06123
Plaintiff:
Lance McMullin
Defendant:
Ronda Pash, Grant, Vanderwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
William Wintworth Foster
Defendant:
Ronda Pash, Richie, Mike Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adriane B. Jackson
Defendant:
St. Louis County Circuit Court, Pine Lawn Police Department, St. Louis County Justice Center Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Edwards-Fears et al
as 4:2014cv01896
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Sherman
Defendant:
Mary Edwards-Fears, Al Blakemore, Tracey Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Orwick et al
as 4:2013cv00806
Plaintiff:
Darnell Young
Defendant:
Beth Orwick, David C. Mason, Daniel Richard Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Tucker et al
as 6:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Quinn Mason
Defendant:
John Tucker, Deatherage, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
Randall Dean Mason
Defendant:
Chad Anderson, Eugene Barry, Bruce Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Kasting et al
as 6:2012cv03381
Plaintiff:
Matthew Quinn Mason
Defendant:
Timothy Kasting, Zachary Copeland, Oland Mitchal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Farnham et al
as 5:2012cv06060
Plaintiff:
Terry Mason Turner
Defendant:
Milo Farnham, Phillip Dean, David Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhummad v. Chester et al
as 4:2009cv00896
Petitioner:
Sharif A Muhummad
Respondent:
Chester, Mason, Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
