Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Payne v. USA
as 1:2015cv01571
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Payne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Payne v. USA
as 1:2014cv00911
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Payne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marshall v. Payne et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Marshall
Defendant:
Robert E. Payne and Henry E. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Payne v. Thacker
as 1:2013cv00210
Petitioner:
Bernard Payne
Respondent:
Sandra Thacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bey v. Edwards et al
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Julius Lawrence Bey
Defendant:
R. Edwards, G. Payne and L. B. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. NRADC et al
as 7:2013cv00037
Defendant:
C/O Michael Cressel, NRADC, C/O J. Nixon and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary v. Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Denise C. McCreary
Defendant:
Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binns v. Clarke et al
as 7:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mr. Fleming, Mr. L. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Statzer et al
as 7:2012cv00079
Defendant:
Correctional Officers at Red Onion State Prison, S. Fields, Head and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pharoah Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Davis et al
as 7:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Defendant:
Officer Walter Davis, Dr. Timothy McBride, Sgt. Paul Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
