Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Smith v. Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2016cv10139
Petitioner:
Stanley Smith
Respondent:
Michigan Attorney General
Stanley v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv12269
Petitioner:
Johnnie Stanley
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Attorney General and United States Attorney
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson #773661 v. Woods et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Petitioner:
Michael Henry Peterson #773661
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods and Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGore #142739 v. Woods
as 2:2014cv00174
Petitioner:
Darryl McGore #142739
Respondent:
Jeff Woods, Attorney General, Unknown Lalonde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCloy v. Oakland County Prosecutor Office et al
as 2:2014cv13110
Plaintiff:
David McCloy
Defendant:
Oakland County Prosecutor Office, John Skrzynski, Waterford Police Department and others
Abuelazam #842658 v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv00818
Plaintiff:
Elias Abuelazam #842658
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv14421
Plaintiff:
Charles Edkins
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, J T Shartle and others
Burnett v. Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jeffery R. Burnett
Defendant:
Michigan Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Attorney General of Michigan et al
as 2:2013md00001
Respondent:
Attorney General of Michigan and Erick Balcarcel
Petitioner:
Alvin Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
