Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Tartareanu et al v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00422
Plaintiff: Daniela Tartareanu and Adrian Tartareanu
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lacy v. Harner et al
as 3:2018cv00826
Defendant: LaPorte County Jail and Harner
Plaintiff: Adrian Eugene Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv01197
Petitioner: ADRIAN BENNETT
Respondent: NORMAN CHAFFINS and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VASQUEZ v. SHERMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Defendant: P. CHATMAN, J. E. KRUEGER, SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff: ADRIAN VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. KREUGER
as 2:2017cv00498
Respondent: J. E. KREUGER
Petitioner: ADRIAN J. VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Austin v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00070
Petitioner: Adrian Austin
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00452
Petitioner: Adrian Parker
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWEATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01601
Petitioner: ADRIAN T. SWEATT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?