Cases 31 - 40 of 287
Custis v. Anderson
as 2:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
Ryricka Nikita Custis
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stapleton v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
United States of America, K.M. Anderson, Paul Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strand v. Aderson
as 7:2023cv00805
Petitioner:
Evron T. Strand
Respondent:
Warden D. Aderson and Warden D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peyton v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Manis et al
as 7:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
