Cases 31 - 40 of 333
Prentiss Albert Banks v. Sean Moore
as 5:2022cv01611
Petitioner:
Prentiss Albert Banks
Respondent:
Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
Chase Bank and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. USA
as 3:2022cv01133
Petitioner:
Elishay Banks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis-Murry v. Contra Costa Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv04349
Plaintiff:
Blake Christopher Davis-Murry
Defendant:
Contra Costa Health Services, Contra Costa Sheriffs Department, Brian Holoyda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moore v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sidni Alfred Moore
Defendant:
Rick Hill, L. Johnson, W. Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, N. Costa, K. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Woodard v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Daray D. Woodard
Defendant:
E. Hobbs, C. Enos, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Castaneda v. US Bank et al
as 8:2021cv02012
Plaintiff:
Zachary Castaneda
Defendant:
US Bank, Amazon, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Defendant:
L. Johnson, J. Osequera, D. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton D. Stowers v. Moreno Valley Camera System et al
as 5:2021cv01063
Defendant:
Riverside Social Services, Moreno Valley Camera System, Sky Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Stowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
