Cases 31 - 40 of 61
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRIGGS v. KOONS et al
as 5:2015cv01849
Plaintiff:
BARRETT QUATINE GRIGGS
Defendant:
RYAN A. KOONS, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT., MUNICIPALITY OF ALLENTOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGGS v. BANACH et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Petitioner:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Respondent:
KELLY BANACH, DAVID HOWELLS and RONALD MANESCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMBERT v. OWENS et al
as 2:2014cv01521
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, GEORGE PETSOCK, RICHARD SLAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv01336
Petitioner:
ANGELO ANTHONY BARRETT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PENNSYLVANIA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRETT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv04879
Petitioner:
ANGELO ANTHONY BARRETT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PENNSYLVANIA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. Norwood et al
as 1:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Marc Erick Barrett
Defendant:
J. Norwood, Robert Womeldorf, Bergon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrett v. Karnes et al
as 1:2014cv01250
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Barrett
Defendant:
Robert Karnes, Clements and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSIL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
FARRELL, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES/CORIZON, NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
