Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Madoff v. Barron's dba Barron's.com a/k/a www.Barrons.com, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00048
Plaintiff: Bernard Madoff doing business as Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Arthur Nadel and Arthur Nadel
Defendant: Barron's doing business as Barron's.com also known as www.Barrons.com, Ward S McGuiness, Diane Sipprelle and others
Respondent: Warden Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Black v. Burns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff: James W Black, III
Defendant: Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Cristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Kroeger et al
as 3:2008cv00978
Petitioner: William R. Black
Respondent: Ann M. Kroeger and Charles Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black v. Robertson Detention Facility
as 3:2008cv00941
Petitioner: William Robert Bobby Black
Respondent: Robertson Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff: Fredrick Orlando Black
Defendant: Anderson County Sheriff's Department, Mark Hobbs and Lieutenant Brandon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black v. USA
as 3:2008cv00159
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Frederick O Black
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Black v. City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00381
Plaintiff: William R. Black
Defendant: City of Springfield, Tennessee, Robertson County, Tennessee and Jeff White
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black v. City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00141
Plaintiff: William R. Black
Defendant: City of Springfield, Tennessee, District Attorney's Office, Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?