Cases 31 - 40 of 40
LIVERMAN v. GUBERNIK et al
as 2:2010cv01161
Plaintiff:
DARRYL A. LIVERMAN
Defendant:
HARRIS GUBERNIK, TERRENCE MOORE, LILLIAN BUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. ORCHID CELLMARK, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
ORCHID CELLMARK, INC., MARGARET A. TERRILL, CHARLOTTE J. WORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Beard et al
as 4:2008cv01915
Plaintiff:
Clifton Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ulli Klemm, Robert Bitner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIVERMAN v. GUBERNIK et al
as 2:2008cv04533
Plaintiff:
DARRYL LIVERMAN
Defendant:
HARRIS GUBERNIK, TERRANCE MOORE, LILLIAN BUDD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIVERMAN v. GUBERNIK et al
as 2:2008cv02726
Plaintiff:
DARRYL LIVERMAN
Defendant:
HARRIS GUBERNIK, TERRANCE MOORE, LILLIAN BUDD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNELLY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv00509
Petitioner:
CLIFTON L. CONNELLY
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHES v. CLIFTON
as 2:2008cv00114
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
ANTHONY A. CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Beard et al
as 4:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Clifton Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ulli Klemm, Edward J. Klem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. Aramark Company
as 1:2007cv01174
Plaintiff:
Clifton W. Nixon
Defendant:
Aramark Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLIFTON v. VAUGHN, et al
as 2:1992cv02667
Petitioner:
ZEBBIE CLIFTON
Respondent:
DONALD T. VAUGHN , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
