Cases 31 - 40 of 446
WEIKEL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv05123
Plaintiff:
KYLE RAYMOND WEIKEL
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO M. ALGARIN, NANCY L. WIEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALLO v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv05122
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY GALLO
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO M. ALGARIN, G. ANDREW SZEKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKWELL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv04882
Plaintiff:
ALEX JOHN BLACKWELL, JR.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO M. ALGARIN, G. ANDREW SZEKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JOHN W. SAWTELLE, DEREK F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2017cv01750
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. CARTER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, D. COLEMAN, J. TRAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. COLEMAN HALL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
HUMBERTO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
COLEMAN HALL FACILITY and RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. STELLIS et al
as 2:2017cv00652
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DEON ALLEN
Defendant:
RYAN ELLIS and RONALD COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PREACHER v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, ERNESTO J. MONGELLUZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raheem v. Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Coleman 1
as 3:2016cv01767
Petitioner:
Abubakr Raheem
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DUKES v. COLEMAN
as 2:2016cv01085
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUKES
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
