Cases 31 - 40 of 376
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Bedford Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clinton Reed
Defendant:
Bedford Co. Sheriff Dept., Austin Swing, Ronnie Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tomlinson v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02740
Petitioner:
Christopher Tomlinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Driver v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Demario Q Driver
Defendant:
Brandon Robinson, Christopher Johnson, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Sheppard et al
as 3:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vaughn
Defendant:
Jonathan Sheppard, Timothy Lehnert, Ashton Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Spangler et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jones
Defendant:
Jerry Spangler, Jim Casey and Christopher Hugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2022cv00663
Petitioner:
Christopher Vaughn
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Daron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Linsey v. Boyd
as 3:2022cv00661
Petitioner:
Christopher Demotto Linsey
Respondent:
Warden Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morton v. George et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Shane George, Sam Braggs and Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. George et al
as 3:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Shane George, Sam Braggs and Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
