Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Curry v. Alabama Department of Public Safety et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
Albert Curry
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Public Safety and Alabama State Trooper Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickle v. Curry et al
as 2:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Pickle
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Scooge, Nurse Kay and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottingham v. Curry
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
Willie Milton Cottingham
Defendant:
Chris Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottingham v. Curry
as 2:2012cv03816
Plaintiff:
Willie Milton Cottingham, III
Defendant:
Chris Curry
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Carter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00834
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curry Adams
Defendant:
F. Carter, Alabama Department of Corrections and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Dudchock et al
as 2:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Wright, Jr
Defendant:
Alex Dudchock, Chris Curry, Fondren and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitworth v. Lowery et al
as 2:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Whitworth, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Lowery, Chris Curry, Anderson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Curry et al
as 2:2011cv04048
Petitioner:
Jaime Duenas Rodriguez
Respondent:
Chris Curry and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castaneda v. Curry et al
as 2:2011cv04049
Petitioner:
Alejandro Castaneda
Respondent:
Chris Curry and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
