Cases 31 - 40 of 9,562
(PC) Collins v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
D. Smith and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Dorton v. Daisy Lee Sterkel et al
as 2:2024cv03603
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Daisy Lee Sterkel, J. Fernandez, D. Moranville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
G. Marquez, D. Baker and David Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bergman v. Santa Cruz County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv02381
Plaintiff:
Sean M Bergman
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County Jail, Chief D. Frietas, Lt. Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills et al
as 2:2024cv02966
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dillingham
Defendant:
K. Mills, D. Williams, J. Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
