Cases 31 - 40 of 821
Lacey v. Potts
as 1:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Adrian L. Lacey
Respondent:
David Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Brian Thompkins, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearman v. Gardner
as 2:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
David Spearman
Defendant:
Officer Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, David Lamar, Mr. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Smoak (INMATE 4)
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Wilson
Defendant:
Jason Smoak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Cox et al
as 7:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
David Donnell Wells
Defendant:
Phyllis Cox and LaDon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
