Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Cater v. Drew (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00739
Plaintiff:
James Otis Cater
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Poole v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01503
Petitioner:
Robby Poole
Respondent:
D.B. Drew, H . Mitchell, Federal Correctional Institution Talladega, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Biggins v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01400
Plaintiff:
Wayne Biggins
Defendant:
Darrell B. Drew, Cynthia Thompson, Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Drew (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
William E. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortson v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
Carey A. Fortson, Sr.
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, Con Agra Foods, LLC, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldridge v. Ingels
as 6:2007cv01022
Plaintiff:
Joshua Drew Aldridge
Defendant:
Rodney Ingels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldridge v. Ingel et al
as 6:2007cv01021
Plaintiff:
Joshua Drew Aldridge
Defendant:
Rodney Ingel and Jay Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Drew
as 1:2007cv00969
Petitioner:
Harold Scott Baker
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Drew et al
as 2:2007cv00926
Petitioner:
Brandon Brown
Respondent:
D.B. Drew and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferrara v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00902
Petitioner:
Paul B Ferrara, Jr
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, D.B. Drew and J Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
