Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Mark Macy v. Barry Watson, et al
as 13-36083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MARION MACY
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY E. WATSON, DAVID ROBINS and NANCY ALBRERS
Turner v. McCall et al
as 1:2013cv01611
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
J. McCall, M. Lukas, S. Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macy v. Watson et al
as 2:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Mark Marion Macy
Defendant:
Barry E Watson, David Robins and Nancy Albrers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. McCall et al
as 3:2013cv03409
Plaintiff:
Anthony R.G. Turner
Defendant:
J. McCall, M. Lukas, S. Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denver Wilson v. B. Padgham, et al
as 13-12368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENVER IVAN WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
B. PADGHAM, Secretary's Representative, T. BOWDEN, Secretary's Representative, FRANKLIN CI WARDEN and others
Turner v. Woodland City Police Chief, et al
as 2:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. G. Turner
Defendant:
Woodland City Police Chief, Richard Rayls, Kelley York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. PADGHAM
as 4:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
DENVER IVAN WILSON
Defendant:
B PADGHAM, T BOWDEN, R HOSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00764
Petitioner:
Anthony E. Watson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Indiana
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clark
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Christopher P Shema, Mark E Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Orsino et al
as 1:2013cv01631
Petitioner:
Lorando E. Watson
Respondent:
Dominic Orsino , (City) New York, Christopher Shanaham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
