Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hailey et al
as 1:2014cv00798
Plaintiff:
Demond E Coleman
Defendant:
T Hailey, Wendy Culp, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2014cv02129
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and James E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02989
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2013cv03177
Plaintiff:
Richard E Coleman
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Turner et al
as 2:2013cv02322
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
G Turner, C. Hougland, Balp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Coleman, Jr. v. Miami-Dade County, et al
as 13-14961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. COLEMAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, As A Municipality and ROBERT KALTER, Esq., Employee of the Office of the Public Defender, Appellate Division, 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2013cv02817
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, Tonya Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02397
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Coleman v. P. Maldonado, et al
as 13-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
P. MALDONADO, M. LOPEZ and A. DIAZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
