Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Michael Baroni v. Edward Klem
as 08-2685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BARONI
Defendant:
EDWARD KLEM
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, REBECCA M. DESANTZ, KATHLEEN A. MCGANTY and others
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, EDWARD KLEM, THOMAS TEMPERINE and others
Dana Young, Sr. v. Edward Klem, et al
as 08-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA E. YOUNG, SR.
Defendant:
EDWARD KLEM, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI MAHANOY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTY GEN PA
Michael Bozzelli v. Edward Klem, et al
as 08-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOZZELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and EDWARD KLEM
Pridgen v. Beard, et al
as 08-1594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARIO PRIDGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Ph.D., BRODOVICH, Ph.D., SHARON BURKS, Ph.D. and others
Spencer v. Klem, et al
as 08-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and EDWARD KLEM
Kasher v. Klem, et al
as 08-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LEE KASHER
Defendant:
EDWARD KLEM and ATTY GEN PA
Defendant - Appellee:
DA BERKS
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, William C. Wetzel, Miknich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brightwell v. Lehman, et al
as 07-3917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB BRIGHTWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH LEHMAN, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, RAYMOND SOBINA, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Somerset, SYLVIA GIBSON, in her official capacity as Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services of the State Correctional Institution at Somerset and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
