Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Bauer et al v. Mailroom Personnel et al
as 2:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Dylan J. Downey, Michael M Morales, Carmela Holt and others
Defendant:
Jack Warner, Melvin E Hopkins, Washington State Department of Corrections Monroe Correctional Complex Mailroom Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Jackson
as 3:2020cv06264
Petitioner:
John Allen Booth
Respondent:
Superintendent of WSR and Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Metcalf v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2020cv01876
Defendant:
Frantz, Eric Jackson, Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momah v. Jackson
as 2:2020cv01713
Petitioner:
Charles M Momah
Respondent:
Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Cuomo et al
as 7:2020cv08930
Defendant:
Board of Parole NYS, NYS Division of Parole Brooklyn #2, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv04159
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, NYS Division of Parole Brooklyn #2, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00533
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Howard Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maier (ID 104561) v. Lawver et al
as 5:2019cv03238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier and Christiano Ariel
Defendant:
Lawver Family Trust, Joseph Desch, Silvia Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maier (ID 104561) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03197
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krause v. Jackson
as 2:2019cv01421
Petitioner:
Keith Dale Krause
Respondent:
Eric Jackson and Harry Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
