Cases 31 - 40 of 64
FLOYD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv03645
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RADZIEWIC, WHALEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv02561
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01453
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
JEFFREY KAUFFMAN and APPLEHILL SURGICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Commonwealth et al
as 3:2014cv02279
Petitioner:
Charles Floyd, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOYD v. DOC-SCI CHESTER
as 2:2014cv05470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC-SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANCIS v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2014cv05176
Plaintiff:
FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BOARDER PROTECTION and PETE GIZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01204
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, J. TREMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2014cv05142
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL, PHILLIPS, STOUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
FLOYD HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY, DEPUTY WARDEN, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Olshefski et al
as 3:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
David L Floyd
Defendant:
Olshefski, Jamie Phillips, C Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
