Cases 31 - 40 of 415
BANKS v. DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clyde Pontefract v. BOP, et al
as 23-3142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Supervisor, Fort Dix
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ZAMUDIO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22602
Petitioner:
REYNALDO PEREZ ZAMUDIO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ-SUAREZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23104
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL RAMIREZ-SUAREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIORITO v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23342
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FIORITO
Defendant:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ulloa v. Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
as 3:2023cv01986
Petitioner:
Alex Ulloa
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOTO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22945
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANTONIO SOTO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saaed Moslem v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 23-2819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAAED MOSLEM
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
OROZCO v. FCI FORT DIX - WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20826
Petitioner:
EZEQUIEL A. OROZCO
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX - WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
