Cases 31 - 40 of 137
Canady v. Clarke et al
as 3:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
Marlon Canady
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Roderic L. Tuell, Benjamin T. Ulep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles, Jr. v. Richmond City Jail
as 1:2014cv00595
Plaintiff:
Fred Watkins Coles, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Schilling et al
as 1:2013cv01550
Plaintiff:
Monica Minor Moore
Defendant:
Fred Schilling, Harold Clerks, Dr. Ammonette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Henning et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Eric Terry
Defendant:
Michael Henning, Vincent M. Gore, L Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Levin et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darryl A. White
Defendant:
Leonard Levin, Debra J. Kirksey, E. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Clarke et al
as 3:2012cv00904
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. T. Henderson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, A. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Schilling et al
as 7:2012cv00571
Defendant:
Dr. Ammonette, Harold Clerks, Dr. Sonja John and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Minor Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mobashar et al
as 7:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Javon D. Brown
Defendant:
Nasseer Mobashar and Fred Schilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Hildebrand et al
as 7:2012cv00213
Defendant:
Bruce R. Conover and Fred D. Hildebrand
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
