Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Hammond v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00118
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Damon T. Hinnger and Robert Adams, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dennis Hammond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. BOWEN, et al
as 5:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT OLIVER
Defendant:
WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN, SGT GREEN, FOSKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv00197
Defendant:
Mrs. Lisa Mayo, Mrs. Rita K. Lomio, Mr. Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
RANDY J HARMON, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, HODGES, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Carr et al
as 1:2018cv04683
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Paul Howard, Jr., Court of Appeals of Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Herschel Gerald Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. BOWDEN et al
as 7:2018cv00170
Petitioner:
JON ROBERT OLIVER
Respondent:
WARDEN TOMMY BOWDEN and Commissioner GREGORY C DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAJOR v. TARRELL et al
as 5:2018cv00356
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CANNON, OFFICER SHAKEURA DANIELS, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TROY S MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Laughlin et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Respondent:
Vance Laughlin, Christopher M. Carr and Gregory C. Dozier
Petitioner:
James Glenn Wilder
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OLIVER v. DOZIER et al
as 2:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
JON ROBERT OLIVER
Respondent:
WARDEN TOMMY BOWDEN and Gregory C. Dozier
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Lawson et al
as 1:2018cv04293
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Dawn Belisle-Skinner, Willie G. Davis, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Delfon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
