Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Stork v. Sanford et al
as 3:2012cv00187
Plaintiff: Frank E Stork
Defendant: Jeff Sanford, Nicholas McKinley, Greg Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00351
Stricken As A Co-respondent Per Order Of 3/22/11: ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER
Respondent: DEPUTY SUPT. CRAIG A. HANKS SR.
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCOY v. ZOELLER
as 1:2011cv00199
Petitioner: HAROLD E. MCCOY
Respondent: GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sammie Booker-El v. Bill Wilson, et al
as 10-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAMMIE L. BOOKER-EL
Defendant - Appellee: BILL WILSON, Superintendent, Superintendent Indiana State Prison, EDWIN G. BUSS, GREG ZOELLER and others
HENSON v. BUSS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant: RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knuckles v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff: Joe Knuckles
Defendant: Elkhart County, George Biddlecome, Greg Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard L. Canterbury v. Greg Zoeller
as 10-1123
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD L. CANTERBURY
Respondent - Appellee: GREG ZOELLER, Indiana Attorney General
Jonathon Sharkey v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 09-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHON SHARKEY, In his official capacity as King othe Vampyre Nation
Defendant - Appellee: MITCH DANIELS, In his official capacity of Governor of the State of Indiana and GREG ZOELLER
SHARKEY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2009cv00263
Plaintiff: JONATHON SHARKEY
Defendant: GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?