Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Reed v. Berkebile et al
as 7:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
D. Berkebile, James Link, R. Slone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Hamilton
Defendant:
Pike County, Kentucky , Rodney Scott , Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seal 1 v. USA
as 3:2011cv00150
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Adrian Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodack et al v. Auriemma et al
as 5:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rodack, Jonathan Lee Riches and Mireya Throop
Defendant:
Geno Auriemma, Maya Moore, Tina Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. USA
as 7:2009cv07103
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenny Darryl Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hamilton v. Thompson et al
as 3:2009cv00594
Petitioner:
Erik Hamilton
Respondent:
LaDonna Thompson and Nancy Doom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Woody Hamilton
Defendant:
Pendleton Decker, Debbie Webb, Rita Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Paris Police Department et al
as 5:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
Philip Lee Dale, Sr.
Defendant:
Paris Police Department, Chris Livingood, Brett Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fulton v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Fulton
Defendant:
Hamilton, Gardner, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Antonelli v. Walters et al
as 7:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael Carmie Antonelli
Defendant:
Susan Walters, Melissa Parr, Susan Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
