Cases 31 - 40 of 60
HAYES v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv00589
Petitioner:
DAVON R. HAYES
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. USA
as 1:2012cv02200
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eric Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. HAYES et al
as 2:2012cv05276
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
CASANDRA HAYES and FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CASSANDRA HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GREEN v. LIBERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv05066
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREEN, SR.
Defendant:
LIBERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, SANDS, ERVING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. CAPUTO et al
as 2:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
LOUIS CAPUTO, WILLIAM DIFENDERFER, MARK D. LANCASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. LIBERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES et al
as 5:2012cv04258
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREEN, SR.
Defendant:
LIBERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, SANDS, ERVING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Walsh et al
as 3:2011cv01739
Plaintiff:
Davon R Hayes
Defendant:
Jerome W Walsh, Lawrence Mahally, Norm Demming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. CROYLE et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HAYES
Defendant:
BRADLEY CROYLE, ANJANEYULU KARUMUDL, DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Davon Hayes
Defendant:
Jerome W. Walsh, Lawrence P Mahally, Myron Stanishefski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
